The "But we've had Bad Popes before" Objection

The "But we've had Bad Popes before" Objection












 With the recent idolatrous, heretical, and blasphemous circus surrounding the Amazon Synod, Novus Ordo and semi-traditionalist authorities and apologists are once again offering false solutions to their hapless followers, solutions aimed at mostly one thing: the continued acceptance of Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”) as the Pope of the Catholic Church, no matter how absurd and indefensible the idea may be — for the only truly intolerable view for them is that of Sedevacantism.

One of the most common objections one hears against Sedevacantism is, “But we’ve had bad Popes before” or, “A bad father is still your father!” People who think that such arguments can legitimize Francis are either not familiar with, or incapable of grasping, the difference between, on the one hand, Catholics who lead immoral lives, and, on the other hand, heretics.

Francis isn’t a bad Catholic. He manifests day in and day out that he is a non-Catholic. That’s the crux. Therefore, saying that we’ve had bad Popes in the past and they were still valid Popes, is totally beside the point.”(https://novusordowatch.org/2019/10/bad-popes-objection/?fbclid=IwAR0UvBJSmotrWW5yggA2SgXhfEcVQzeSzA0CGY-oaQko7oTsm9h2By4PpUU)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sacred Scripture

Sacred Heart of Jesus